You quote the wrong part of GPL FAQ is very clear.The part you quote is about If a programming language interpreter is released under the GPL, does that mean programs written to be interpreted by it must be under GPL-compatible licenses?!Hence the to the [GPL-licensed] interpreter.The relevant part is the last 2 paragraphs: []Another similar and very common case is to provide libraries with
GNU General Public License v2.0 - GNU Project - Free Sep 04, 2017 Which License Should I Use? MIT vs. Apache vs. GPL | Exygy Jun 21, 2016
GPL Licensing | ThemeThread
Qt licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 3 is appropriate for the development of Qt applications provided you can comply with the terms and conditions of the GNU LGPL version 3 (or GNU GPL version 3). Qt contains also third-party code that is licensed under specific open-source licenses from the original authors. GNU General Public License v2.0 | Choose a License The GNU GPL is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. There are multiple variants of the GNU GPL, each with different requirements.
GNU General Public License v2.0 - GNU Project - Free
GNU General Public License | Open Source Initiative